Our three copies of Information Architecture just arrived. Enter to win your copy.
Better late than never! It’s time now for our annual year in review.
A warm season’s greetings from the (little) crew here at UX Booth. While we’re busy stuffing ourselves with tasty treats and the company of family and friends, we wanted to take a minute to share with you some of the highlights of the year.
Oh, before we go: we won’t be posting an article next Tuesday, as most of us will still be recovering from the holidays. Rest assured, we’ll be back to our regularly scheduled programming on January 8th.
Five of the year’s finest
What do Jonathan Frakes and UX Booth have in common? Both are interested in dispelling myths. In February, UX Booth author Vishal Mehta took us on a journey through the myths of usability. It’s expensive? MYTH. It’s free? MYTH. It kills creativity? NOPE. Vishal makes an important call to arms:
If you ignore or take it up as a low priority, the perceived quicker time to market is only going to cause harm. We cannot afford any myths.
Yes yes, the HTML5-Flash debate is a hot one and a common one to boot, but we really enjoyed SuAnne Hall’s approach to the topic. In the true spirit of UX Booth, she focuses on what it all means for users.
If HTML5 thrives where Flash struggled and becomes the dominator in the choice for new mobile and desktop technology, will users benefit from the transition? Yes, as long as designers and developers do their jobs right.
In Andy Montgomery’s post, we learn how to slay hobgoblins. By “hobgoblins,” Andy means “foolish consistency” in web design (but a great big kudos for bringing in the word “hobgoblin,” Andy!). The article looks at good and poor examples of visual design inconsistencies, and the comments offer fantastic further reading and discussion on the matter.
Editor’s note: Our favorite comment of the year may very well be from reader “mla,” who liked the article but felt the need to condemn Jimmy John’s for their sandwiches. That’s passion.
Getting started in user centered design can be a pain in the neck. All these terms are thrown around that the Old Hats can’t even seem to agree on. Darren Northcutt does a fantastic job at explaining the difference between two such terms: “user experience design” and “information architecture.” It‘s awesome for those new to the field/s.
And for those of you who want to delve a bit deeper, Andy Fitzgerald splendidly responds in his post UX Unicorns and Other Fanciful Creatures. He dives off into the deep waters of semantic grammar, and thrives rather than drowns.
Chances are that if you’re designing for the Web, you’ll at some point find the need to understand elements of mobile design. In this first of two posts on mobile design, Elaine McVicar walks UX Booth readers through some building blocks for mobile information architecture.
Each year technology takes another leap, and with that, it’s clear we need to change along with it. Developing a mobile and tablet friendly information architecture is just the first step in creating a great mobile experience.
See you next year!
If there’s anything you hope to see on UX Booth in 2013, be sure to let us know in the comments! Otherwise, have a wonderful holiday!